|
TOOL SPOTLIGHT |
AICPA publishes practice aid on AI for financial statement auditors
The document splits into two parts: one for when your client uses AI, one for when your firm does.
The AICPA published a new practice aid this week titled 'Artificial Intelligence (AI) Considerations for Financial Statement Auditors.' The Journal of Accountancy reports that it provides a framework to help auditors understand how AI affects financial statement audits - covering both the client side and the firm side of an engagement.
BY THE NUMBERS
|
Oct 13, 2026 PUBLISHED |
AI feature WHAT THIS IS |
The document is split into two sections. The Journal of Accountancy reports that the first covers how an organization's use of AI in financial reporting affects the financial statement audit - including risk assessment and how AI may affect controls. The second covers audit firms' own use of AI-related technological resources. Per the Journal of Accountancy, that second section addresses quality management, appropriate supervision and review, and continued attention to professional judgment and professional skepticism - a signal that the AICPA is treating AI-assisted audit work as a supervision problem, not just a technology one. The Journal of Accountancy also notes that engagement team partners are expected to understand the AI tools being used, confirm they are firm-approved, and verify staff are using them correctly.
The practice aid is described as a starting point, not a finished product. The Journal of Accountancy notes that more guidance - including a deeper treatment of assessing the risk of material misstatement and evaluating audit evidence when a client is using AI - will be added to section one in the future. That means firms should read what is there now as directional rather than comprehensive, particularly on the client-AI side of engagements.
For audit team leads planning engagements where a client has deployed AI in financial reporting processes, this is a document to read before the planning memo is drafted, not after. The firm-use section is immediately actionable for quality management reviews of any AI tools already running in production workflows.
WHAT TO VERIFY
| Confirm any AI audit tools your firm uses are on the firm-approved list before the next engagement kicks off. | |
| Section one on client AI use is explicitly incomplete - additional guidance on risk of material misstatement is still forthcoming. | |
| Supervision and professional skepticism requirements apply to AI-assisted procedures the same as any other - the practice aid makes this explicit. |
SPONSORED
QUESTIONS THIS ANSWERS
Does the practice aid cover AI tools auditors use, or only client AI systems?
Both. Per the Journal of Accountancy, section one covers a client's use of AI in financial reporting; section two covers audit firms' own use of AI tools in performing engagements.
Is the practice aid complete?
Not yet. The Journal of Accountancy notes that additional guidance on assessing the risk of material misstatement and evaluating audit evidence when a client uses AI will be added to section one in the future.
SOURCES
Where this comes from
GO DEEPER
Go deeper
Reported from the linked source pages as published on the dates shown. Audit Friendly has not tested the product unless a review is linked.
How accountants are using AI, automation and smarter workflows to close faster, audit cleaner, and free up time for real work.
Accounting Stack · Audit Friendly Data · Accounting & Finance Jobs
Audit Friendly · modernaccounting.ai